Editor Recommended
Stay Connected With VE
ORCL
Cheapest Stocks in the S&P 500 (INDEXSP:.INX) – Including LSI Corp. (NYSE:LSI) and Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ:GILD)
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
High Value Score Stocks – Including Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) and Gamestop Corp. (NYSE:GME)
When narrowing the market to a focus group of stocks to choose from, The Applied Finance Group (AFG) has a core set of principles we concentrate on to develop a group of stocks that are more likely to outperform the market.
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Attractive Technology Stocks - Including Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ:MSFT) and Hewlett-Packard Co. (NYSE:HPQ)
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Attractive Large-Cap Opportunities – Including Kohl’s Corp. (NYSE:KSS) Whirlpool (NYSE:WHR) and Colgate-Palmolive (NYSE:CL)
The Applied Finance Group (AFG) has a disciplined approach for identifying companies that are expected to outperform and underperform the market by using proprietary metrics and measurements that have been tested and proven through time. Because AFG’s research is fundamentally derived, AFG’s quantitative analysis spans across growth and value stocks, all sectors, industries, and market caps with over 20,000 covered securities globally.
When searching for Large-Cap ideas, AFG’s Buy/Sell list is a good starting place as it has proven to create a significant spread in performance between companies that come up on AFG’s buy list and those on the sell list. Further focusing on companies based on AFG’s proprietary screening criteria (Economic Margin, valuation, quality of earnings, and management’s ability to create shareholder wealth) will save investors time in their research process. The result is a target group of stocks that can help you outperform as well as identify potential torpedoes to avoid in your portfolios.
Below is a list of attractive companies in the S&P 500 from each major AFG sector (excluding financials). It serves as a focus list of companies for investors to begin with as they meet AFG’s criteria to be an attractive opportunity. They are more likely to outperform their sector peers and the S&P 500, the benchmark that AFG’s clients most often compare themselves with.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source: EconomicMargin.com
AFG's Valuation Metric – Measures the percent to target (deviation between a stock’s current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model (modified discounted cash flow model).
Economic Margin - A corporate performance measurement that addresses the gaps in GAAP, eliminating distortions caused by accounting policies to measure what a company is truly earning above or below their cost of capital.
Management Quality – Assesses management’s ability to make wealth creating decisions.
+View our List of Value Expectations Recommended Articles
AFG Recommendation Performance
9/1998 – 5/2009
Annualized Returns
Source: AFGView client databases from 9/1998 – 5/2009
Universe size: 4,000 to 5,500 firms
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Most Actively Traded Stocks (S&P 500) – Including Wal-Mart Stores (NYSE:WMT) and Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)
The list of most actively traded stocks in the S&P 500 seems to attract the most attention amongst the investment community and always create a good amount of “Buzz”. We decided to take the list of the most actively traded stocks over the last 50 trading days (excluding financials) and run them through The Applied Finance Group’s (AFG’s) meat grinder to see which are worthy of the hype and are attractive investment opportunities and which you should probably stay away from.
AFG uses a set of criteria in its stock selection process that has proven successful at identifying winners and losers in the market including its proprietary measure of corporate performance (Economic Margin), valuation, management quality and earnings quality among other criteria. Of the companies listed that are heavily traded, AFG believes the companies with expected improvement in Economic Margins, attractive valuations, and a wealth creating management team are the companies that will be the most likely to outperform the market and their sector peers. (register now to receive exclusive buy ideas- it's fast and free!)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The rankings above were provided using AFG’s research product AFGView.com and are ranked based on AFG’s overall investment opportunity signal, valuation signal and expected changes in Economic Margins. The companies must rank as attractive or unattractive in all 3 categories or the firm is listed as neutral.
Below is a brief description of those variables with informative links.
Source: EconomicMargin.com
AFG's Valuation Metric – Measures the percent to target (deviation between a stock’s current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model (modified discounted cash flow model).
Economic Margin - A corporate performance measurement that addresses the gaps in GAAP, eliminating distortions caused by accounting policies to measure what a company is truly earning above or below their cost of capital.
Management Quality – Assesses management’s ability to make wealth creating decisions.
+View our List of Value Expepectations Recommended Articles
AFG Recommendation Performance
9/1998 – 5/2009
Annualized Returns
Source: AFGView client databases from 9/1998 – 5/2009
Universe size: 4,000 to 5,500 firms
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Identifying Buy Ideas Using AFG's Screener Tool - Including Sprint Nextel Corp (S), Pfizer (PFE) and Forest Labs. Inc (FRX)
About the AFG Screener
Professional investors have many ways to screen and narrow their list of constituents to create a focus list of companies they use to select from to develop their portfolios. In the industry, there are many screeners that are part of subscriptions to databases and investment tools, however, many of them do not provide guidance on the best screening methods to use. Created by The Applied Finance Group (AFG), the AFG Screener tool is a web-based company-screening application located on AFGView.com that is designed to save you time when narrowing your list of constituents. More importantly, AFG’s screener allows you to use proprietary variables that have been proven to outperform, helping investors make better investment decisions.
AFG’s Screener allows clients to find aggregate groups of companies that meet specific criteria from AFG’s entire global universe of over 14,000 securities. Using the Screener, one can find a list of companies that either match one of AFG’s preset screens or one based on a customized screen that you create.
The AFG Screener identifies attractive valuations, strong management teams, corporate performance, and the quality of earnings of a company as well as all traditional financial variables,
Because AFG’s Screener is web-based, clients can gain access from anywhere that has an internet connection, convenience and ease of “one-click screening” with our default screens, various forms of result presentations, and compatibility with Microsoft Excel for further analysis.
How to Use AFG’s Screener
Access AFG custom built screens that many clients regularly utilize that include AFG’s proprietary Economic Margin (EM), valuation and management quality variables along with many others.
Build your own custom screens using any variables you are familiar with such as price multiples and other accounting information by themselves or coupled with powerful AFG variables with just a few clicks of the mouse.
Once you have narrowed your list of constituents to those companies that meet your specific criteria you can easily upload your new list into AFG’s valuation model to analyze each company in greater detail or see how they rank vs. their peers on key AFG variables.
Default / Custom Screens
Whenever a new user is introduced to AFG’s Screener, they are provided with two default screens – AFG’s Default Buy screen and AFG’s Default Sell screen. Using these screens, one can filter companies based on AFG’s buy/sell criteria.
However, the AFG Screener is very intuitive allowing clients to create their own screens based on custom criteria. There are countless combinations that can be used to create a custom screens, as there are over 600 variables to choose from. AFG’s Screener tool can be used to list companies based on Indexes, Sectors, Industries, and previously created Portfolios.
Using Excel / Further Research
AFG screens can also be accessed using AFG’s Excel add-in to combine results with other spreadsheets or to create a report for your investment team. Exporting your information will give you more freedom to read, organize and document your data as well as pull in other variables within AFG’s Excel add-in to easily rank order your list of companies based on the same variables available within the screener.
Example Screen:
Below is a list of 12 companies that resulted from a quick screen that sought to identify those companies within the S&P 500 with attractive valuations, market cap above $1 billion, expected to improve EMs greater than sector peers, and that have a current stock price of under $30. Improving EMS and an attractive default AFG valuation rank is a good place to start when looking for the companies most likely to outperform. This is just one simple example of the capabilities of using AFG’s screener tool to select a focused list of stocks that are the most likely to outperform and a list that is worthy of more time spent on due diligence on the companies that meet the specified criteria.
The Applied Finance Group would also like to invite professional investors to join AFG’s Market Forecast Project so you can better understand what your peers currently think about the market and cultivate the “wisdom of Crowds” into actionable investment ideas and themes.
Register to View Complete Market Review and Sector Analysis, it's FAST and FREE!
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
S&P 500 - YTD Returns by Sector
Below is a chart and table outlining the 2009 year to date performance of the sectors within the S&P 500. The Technology sector has lead the way thus-far while Utilities and Financials have been dragging down the overall average of the index. As previously reported in our Market Forecast Project, Technology was also voted most attractive sector according to our survery of professional investors. These sectors are based on the sector classification created by The Applied Finance Group.
Source(The Applied Finance Group)
Source(The Applied Finance Group)
| Ticker | Name | Sector | Attractiveness | Valuation | EM Change |
| Attractive Technology Companies - S&P 500 | |||||
| HRS | HARRIS CORP | Technology | Attractive | Attractive | Positive |
| IBM | INTERNAT BUSINESS MACHNS | Technology | Attractive | Attractive | Positive |
| ORCL | ORACLE CORP | Technology | Attractive | Attractive | Positive |
| WDC | WESTERN DIGITAL CORP | Technology | Attractive | Attractive | Negative |
| HPQ | HEWLETT-PACKARD CO | Technology | Attractive | Attractive | Negative |
| Unattractive Technology Companies - S&P 500 | |||||
| AMAT | APPLIED MATERIALS INC | Technology | Unattractive | Unattractive | Negative |
| JDSU | JDS UNIPHASE CORP | Technology | Unattractive | Unattractive | Negative |
| KLAC | KLA-TENCOR CORP | Technology | Unattractive | Unattractive | Negative |
| MU | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | Technology | Unattractive | Unattractive | Negative |
| CIEN | CIENA CORP | Technology | Unattractive | Unattractive | Negative |
Source(The Applied Finance Group)
*Valuation & EM Change are Ranks within their sector
AFG's Buy/Sell Criteria - factors in Economic Margin, Management Quality, and AFG's Valuation Metric. In order to determine Management Quality, AFG scores management on their growth decisions in accordance with the company’s ability to either create or destroy wealth. AFG's Valuation Metric measures a company's Percent to Target (the deviation between a stock's current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model.
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Professional Investors Vote For Technology
What is the most attractive sector? That's one of the questions we asked a group of professional investors in our Market Forecast Project. The answer varied from person to person, but there was a general consensus. The majority was in favor of Technology, which pulled away by far with 41 of a possible 98 first place votes. Survey participants were asked to rank a list of sectors from 1-11 in order of how attractive they found that sector to be over the next 12 months. Technology ranked highest with an average ranking of 2.7, well ahead of the rest; Basic Material placed second with an average rank of 4.8. We've put together a list below of both attractive and unattractive companies within the Technology sector. It may be worthwhile to take a closer look at the companies listed. If the insight provided by the survey’s investment professionals holds true, you could be among those who outperform the market.
Market Forecast Sector Ranking Results
15. Rank Order, which sector seems most attractive to you over the next 12 months?
(1 = Most attractive)
Results Have Been Ranked by Most Attractive
1 Technology
2 Basic material
3 Energy & extraction
4 Health
5 Capital goods
6 Consumer non-durable
7 Financials
8 Consumer services
9 Consumer durable
10 Transportation
11 Utilities
10 Attractive Technology Stocks
10 Unattractive Technology Stocks
AFG's Buy/Sell Criteria - factors in Economic Margin, Management Quality, and AFG's Valuation Metric. In order to determine Management Quality, AFG scores management on their growth decisions in accordance with the company’s ability to either create or destroy wealth. AFG's Valuation Metric measures a company's Percent to Target (the deviation between a stock's current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model.
AFG's Valuation Metric – Measures the percent to target (deviation between a stock’s current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model (modified discounted cash flow model).
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Economic Competition: Competitive Advantage Period
Traditional Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) models have been been underutilized in equity analysis over the years primarily because of the assumptions one has to sign off on. We will concentrate on just two of the major issues we have with traditional DCF models, the lack of ability to deal with competition and the perpetuity assumption embedded in a DCF model. These assumptions lead to irrational calculations of intrinsic value and force analysts to make compromising decisions in their model building efforts.
AFG uses a modified DCF model that accurately addresses the competitive nature of the business while also dealing with the perpetuity issue through our Economic Margin decay or competitive advantage period.
The four factors that affect AFG’s Competitive Advantage Period (CAP) are;
Profitability – High Profit leads to increased competition and a higher decay rate
Variability – Higher volatility leads to less predictability and a higher decay rate
Trend – AFG gives the benefit of the doubt to an upward trend which leads to a lower decay rate
Invested Capital – Large Invested Capital creates barriers to entry and leads to lower decay rate
The Decay Rate is the rate at which the Economic Margins™ will diminish over time due to competition, market conditions and limited investment opportunities. Higher decay rates translate into shorter competitive advantage periods, while lower decay rates translate into longer competitive advantage periods.
The Decay Rate profile is downward sloping to the right, which means that Economic Margins™ over time diminish to zero. This does not mean that the company will not have earnings, but instead the company will have an Economic Margin™ of zero, which indicates there are no excess profits after the investors are paid and the depreciating assets are replaced.When selecting securities, companies that are maintaining a high level of economic profitability or growing their profits rapidly are attractive from an investment standpoint. However, the more profitable a firm is the more likely other companies will attempt compete away excess returns.
To illustrate this, one has to look no further than Dell Computer. Dell Computer had Economic Margins™ hovering around 40% (top 5% of all companies) in 1997 and 1998, but soon every major firm was announcing that they were going to build computers to order. Why? Because they saw the huge profits that Dell was making. The result is that Dell's Economic Margin™ for 1999 was around 25%, a decline of 37.5% in just one year. The remaining factors are relatively straight-forward, in that volatile returns are worth less than consistent returns, companies with an increasing Economic Margins™ are worth more than a company in decline, and large companies have a natural barrier to entry, thus a lower decay rate.
Theory: Excess return gets competed away
Fact: In 1997, the median top decile Economic Margin (EM) firm = 17.4%. 10 years later, that same group of companies had a median EM of 6.5%. On the other hand, the bottom decile had an EM of -12.2%, 10 years later that same group had a median EM of -1.0%.
Current Top Decile Economic Margin Companies (S&P 500 ex. financials)
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Fidelity's Low Priced Stock Strategy - Part II
Back in February Valueexpectations.com released a blog highlighting Fidelity’s Low Priced Stock Fund that follows a strategy of only investing in stocks with a share price of under $35. In that blog we provided a list of 30 stocks that we thought were attractively priced according to The Applied Finance Group’s (AFG's) valuation model broken up into three price brackets: under $10, $10 to $20 and $20 to $35.
From Feb 5th 2009 to June 5th 2009 the 30 stocks recommended as a group outperformed the S&P 500 by an average of 36.5%, the 10 stocks under $10 outperformed by 57.1%, the $10 to $20 stocks outperformed by 40.1% and the $20 to $35 stocks outperformed by 12.5% respectedly.
Joel Tillinghast, the fund’s manager began this fund with a strategy of only investing in stocks under $10. Since this stragtegy began Fidelity has moved the stock price limit to $35 where it currently sits. Tillinghast believes that share price alone is not of importance but the lower priced, smaller-cap universe of stocks experiences the most frequent mispricing’s and also has the least amount of analyst coverage.
As an update to the prior blog on this strategy Valueexpectations.com provided a list of 30 stocks that we believe are attractively priced and do not fit AFG's default sell criteria. Each group is ranked based on valuation attractiveness. AFG's analysis begins and ends with valuation, however along the way there are other key factors AFG considers when looking for buy opportunities: expected Economic Margin improvement, management quality, earnings quality.
Attractively Priced Companies Under $30
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Sector Valuation Outlook - Technology
In our May Market Review we released a series of graphs representing the valuation attractiveness of each sector relative to its historical norms and to the entire AFG universe. Below is a graph representing the AFG Technology sector which is attractively priced when you compare against its historical trading ranges (red line) and when comparing against the overall AFG Universe (represented by the value of 1). Listed are the 10 most attractive and 10 least attractive companies in the AFG Technology sector that are within the S&P 500. Also listed below the graph is an explanation of AFG’s Relative Valuation Chart.
Technology Sector Relative Valuation Chart
Relative Valuation Chart -This graph shows the Percent to Target Current (Valuation Attractiveness) for a universe relative to the overall market. Values greater than 1 indicate the universe is more undervalued than the market, while values less than 1 indicate the opposite. The red line identifies the historical median value to provide a basis to understand valuation levels relative to historic norms. This example illustrates that the median Technology company is undervalued relative to the market currently and has been trading at a discount to its historic relative valuation, indicating a potentially attractive opportunity.
Top/Bottom 10 Companies In AFG Tech Sector Ranked by Valuation Attractiveness (within S&P 500)
Note: Telecommunications companies are included in the AFG Technology Sector
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Sell in May and go away? We say no way!
The Halloween Indicator in the stock market sometimes defined as “sell in May and go away” is a strategy that is based on the difference in the performance of the market during May to October vs. November to April. The strategy is to invest in the S&P 500 during “the best 6 months” and switch to bonds during “the worst 6 months” to avoid the summer doldrums of small to negative returns. Since January of 1950 the average returns for November to April “good months” is 7.9% compared to the 2.5% average return delivered from May to October ‘bad months”.
Although there is a significant spread in returns between the good and bad months, does this mean you should convert to bonds and go on a vacation until September? There are several views for and against market timing but we feel it is too difficult to identify when to be out and when to be in the market. If you dig deeper into the market performance since 1950, you will find that 20 good and 20 bad months make up a significant part of the market performance. For more information read the following market timing strategy filled with pitfalls.
The market has been up in those worst 6 months 60% of the time since 1989, not as profitable as the best 6 months but still positive. I believe 2009 is a good lesson for many, with all of the inefficiencies and irregularities in today’s market, the mixed macro economic reports, and the belief we are headed toward a recovery, jumping out of the market could mean missing out on making up for some of the losses the market handed us in 2008
However, being invested isn’t enough, identifying quality companies and a good value will put you in an even better position to outpace the general market. Listed below are companies that should be considered as potential investment opportunities. These companies all have a valuation attractiveness near the top of their sector in addition to expected improvement of profitability (Economic Margin) above their sector, and do not follow a wealth destroying strategy defined by AFG’s management quality score.
Attractive companies to consider in each sector instead of selling in may and going away
A brief description of AFG's buy criteria variables is below:
• Economic Margin - A corporate performance measurement that addresses the gaps in GAAP, eliminating distortions caused by accounting policies to measure what a company is truly earning above or below their cost of capital.• Valuation Model – Using AFG’s modified discounted cash flow model to measure the intrinsic value of a firm compared to its peers.• Management Quality – Assess management’s ability to make wealth creating decisions.
Equity Research Reports and AFG 50 Performance Update
*Start Date for 2004 is 6/10/2004 (inception) *Returns 6/10/2004 - 4/21/09
*AFG50 is a model portfolio and results do not include management fees or transaction costs *AFG50 is re-balanced at end of each Quarter to remain sector neutral vs. the S&P500
*Average Annual Turnover: 18%
AFG 50:
• An actively managed portfolio of 50 stocks, remaining sector-neutral.
• Long-only and targeting turnover of less than 40% annually.
Our Goals:
• To consistently beat the index our clients are most often measured against, the S&P 500.
• To serve as an outsourced research team, distributing relevant content to our clients on a weekly basis.
• To provide consistent, actionable buy ideas in each major economic sector.
Sample Reports and Process Overview:
Full Report: MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS (MHS)
Update: United Technologies Corp. (UTX) Q109 Update
Special Note: Note on ORCL to Acquire JAVA
AFG 50 Process Overview (PDF)
Professional Investors: Click here for more information and a Free Trial of The AFG 50
Individuals: Email us for more information on Advisors using this or similar investment strategies
info@valueexpectations.com
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Market Leaders Since November
Tickersense.com has recently published an article highlighting 15 companies that have been the leaders of the market since the low on November 20, 2008. Made up mostly of Tech stocks (8 of 15), this list of companies has been responsible for about half of the total change of the S&P500 since November 20, and the author believes it is a good place to start if you are “looking for leadership”. Below is a table highlighting the price performance of 12 of the 15 companies (Financials were excluded as well as WYE and SGP due to takeovers).
A second table provides an analysis of the valuation attractiveness of these companies as well as the market expectations for sales growth implied in the stock’s current price using AFG’s Value Expectations interface. Measuring the spread between a company’s VE sales growth expectations and what it has historically delivered should give you a good idea of which companies have the best chance of meeting or exceeding those expectations, and thus are more likely to outperform.
Performance From November 20, 2008 to Yesterday's Close
Valuation Attractiveness & Implied Sales Growth Expectations
*AFG’s Value Expectations allows us to understand the Sales Growth, EBITDA Margin, and Asset Turnover a company has to deliver in the future to justify its current trading price. In theory and in normal circumstances, if the imbedded future performance is very conservative relative to the company’s historical performance, the stock is regarded as undervalued. The table displays the implied future Sales Growth of the list of companies assuming their EBITDA Margins and Asset Turnovers stay at the 5 year median levels.
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Fidelity's Low Priced Stock Strategy
Fidelity’s Low Priced Stock Fund, which launched in 1989 (18 Billion AUM) and is managed by Joel Tillinghast, follows a simple strategy… Only invest in stocks with a share price under $35. This strategy first started with Tillinghast only investing in stocks below $10 a share, but later he moved the limit up to $35 a share. He argues that share price alone is not important but that the small-cap universe contains the most frequently mispriced stocks and the least amount of analyst coverage.
Although his fund at best has been a market performer as of late, Tillinghast had taken advantage of such mispricing’s during the last 15 years, averaging an 11% annual return compared to the 6% return earned by the S&P 500 over the same period. The fund had been closed to investors since 2003, but was recently reopened in December. Fidelity says they reopened the fund to get more cash inflow to be able to take advantage of all of the investment opportunities they see in the market.
Below is a list of the top holdings in Fidelity’s Low Priced Stock Fund as well as stocks that AFG believes are attractively priced in three price brackets: under $10, $10 to $20, and $20 to $35. Compare the implied sales growth priced-in to justify the current trading price (VE Sales Growth) vs. what the company has delivered in sales growth the past 5 years (5 Year Median Sales Growth) to see if the expectations are realistic for the company to achieve. The more realistic the expectations are, compared to what has been delivered, the more likely the firm will be to out-perform.
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Stay Connected With Value Expectations
