JAVA

Using The Applied Finance Group's (AFG's) Value Expectations interface we have provided an analysis of the expectations embedded in the stock prices of some of the top performers in the S&P 500 year to date (excluding financials) to see which companies have the lowest expectations for sales growth (VE Sales Growth) relative to what the company has been able to deliver historically (5 Year Median Sales Growth).

AFG’s Value Expectations interface provides clients a platform to better understand economic profitability, and at the same time understand the performance a company must deliver to justify its current stock price. By understanding the embedded expectations a company must deliver to justify their current trading price, clients can develop a “hurdle rate” to quickly determine if the company’s expectations are rich or low. Take, for example, the typical company during the tech bubble: the expectations that were priced into the average tech stock far exceeded what it could realistically deliver. For this reason, AFG identified the technology sector as overvalued, as well as potential torpedoes such as Cisco, whose expectations were unrealistically high.

By gaining a better understanding of the embedded expectations built in to security prices, relative to what a company has delivered historically, can provide insight into the Sales Growth, EBITDA Margin, and Asset Turnover a company must deliver in the future to justify its current trading price. In many circumstances, if the imbedded future performance is very conservative relative to the company’s historical performance, the stock is regarded as undervalued.

The top performers of the S&P 500 listed below are ranked based on valuation attractiveness using The Applied Finance Group’s valuation model. You would like to look for companies with attractive valuations and modest expectations for revenue growth relative to what the company has been able to achieve over the past five years when looking for potential investment opportunities as these types of companies have proven through time to outperform firms with the opposite characteristics.

If you would like to view some of the favorite long and short investment ideas provided by professional investors click here to view the results for AFG's Market Forecast Project.

Sales Growth Expectations of S&P 500 Top Performers of 2009

Source: EconomicMargin.com

AFG's Valuation Metric – Measures the percent to target (deviation between a stock’s current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model (modified discounted cash flow model).

Economic Margin - A corporate performance measurement that addresses the gaps in GAAP, eliminating distortions caused by accounting policies to measure what a company is truly earning above or below their cost of capital.

Management Quality – Assesses management’s ability to make wealth creating decisions.

To stay updated on how other professional investor's currently view the market join our Market Forecast Project survey and be among the first to receive the results.

With 3 Quarters of 2009 now in the books, we thought it would be timely to provide a list of the top 20 performers in the S&P 500 so far this year to give investors an idea of which stocks have been doing well. Along with the list of top 20 performing companies, we have also provided a breakdown of the average return by sector as defined by AFG vs. the entire S&P 500 index to show which sectors have been leading the way. Also by using The Applied Finance Group’s (AFG's) research and valuation model we have provided further analysis on 4 of the top performing companies, 2 that we find attractive going forward and 2 that we find unattractive, based on valuation attractiveness, expected improvement in economic profitability and the overall investment attractiveness, which is based on various criteria AFG uses when identifying long/short opportunities.

Top 20 Performers In S&P 500 YTD (Total Return)

2009 YTD Sector performance (average return %) in S&P 500

 Here are a few companies from the list of top 2009 returns and we view these companies going forward based on valuation, Economic Margin Improvement, and other criteria AFG uses to value securities.

Other Popular Articles: 

Now that we are more than halfway through 2009, It is an excellent time to highlight the top performers in the S&P 500 year-to-date and see which companies look the most attractive according to The Applied Finance Group (AFG). AFG’s valuation techniques have proven successful since 1996 at identifying mispriced securities and helping their clients take advantage of those market inefficiencies. Beyond valuation AFG helps clients understand the true economic profitability a company earns by using their Economic Margin methodology.

Economic Margin (EM) corrects distortions caused by traditional accounting policies to give a more accurate assessment of a company's true profitability. It is important to understand the direction a company's EM's are heading because companies expected to improve their Economic Margins have proven to be more likely to outperform than those with EM’s expected to deteriorate. The EM Framework addresses profitability, competition, growth and cost of capital. When factoring in each of these variables, investors can fully assess a company's value.
 

AFG's Buy/Sell criteria factors in Economic Margin, Management Quality, and AFG's Valuation Metric. In order to determine Management Quality, AFG scores management on their growth decisions in accordance with the company’s ability to either create or destroy wealth. AFG's Valuation Metric measures a company's Percent to Target (the deviation between a stock's current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model.

AFG's Valuation Metric – Measures the percent to target (deviation between a stock’s current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model (modified discounted cash flow model).
 

Below is a chart and table outlining the 2009 year to date performance of the sectors within the S&P 500. The Technology sector has lead the way thus-far and the Financial and Utility sectors have been dragging down the overall index performance coming up on the halfway point of 2009. Along with sector performance we have also provided a table with the best and worst 10 performing stocks within the S&P 500 index so far this year.

It is nice to see that 2 of the top 10 performers in the S&P 500 index (S, FCX) are stocks that we have recommended on multiple occasions on ValueExpectations.com. VE.com recommended Sprint on 11/26/08 AFG Buys, 12/29/08 High Value Score, 3/13/09 10 Most Undervalued and Freeport Mc-Moran on 1/17/09 4 Stocks To Consider, 1/30/09 5 Cheap Stocks, 2/17/09 Digging Deep.

Average Sector Returns (S&P 500 YTD)

Average Sector Returns (S&P 500 YTD)

Best and Worst 10 Performing Companies YTD 2009 (S&P 500)

The Applied Finance Group

Bloomberg provides a score for companies within the S&P 500 based on an average of all analyst ratings from the street. Below is a table highlighting companies with the best analyst ratings, largest increase in rating, highest price targets, and worst analyst ratings and the valuation attractiveness of each of these companies based on The Applied Finance Group’s (AFG) valuation model.

Companies within each of these groups are ranked from most attractive from a valuation perspective to the least attractive. VE.com will actively track the performance of these recommendations and see how they stack up to the analyst recommendations in each group. AFGview.com, AFG’s professional investor website allows you to compare any company using their rating versus the consensus ratings of the sell side. If you are interested in an analysis on a specific company, contact afgsales@afgltd.com.

Best/Worst Analyst Rated Companies (Bloomberg)

AFG's Valuation Model – Using AFG’s modified discounted cash flow model to measure the intrinsic value of a firm compared to its peers. AFG's Value Score - A score which represents the ranked percent to target (deviation between stock’s current trading price and AFG’s current default target price) or attractiveness (upside) relative to the universe. A Value Score of 100 is the most undervalued and 0 is the most overvalued company in the universe.

As the first 100 days of the new administration have come and gone, portfolio managers and analysts are searching through the market to see which stocks, industries, and sectors will gain from new policy and which ones are potential torpedoes in their portfolio. In AFG’s Monthly Market Review we have highlighted some of the focus of the new administration and how it can affect decisions as an investor, and we continue to search through the market in the hope of identifying which companies warrant their performance and which ones look to be unattractive from a valuation standpoint. The companies within the Financial sector have moved for reasons other than valuation, and will not be evaluated from a valuation perspective but it is interesting to see which companies have done the best and worst given the recent market shift.

Below is a comparison of the performance of the market with the last four presidents - we understand that each president walked into a different economic environment, but it is interesting to see how each one faired their first 100 days. The key will be how the market does over the long haul, especially given the significant policy changes and challenges the markets face over the course of the next year.

S&P 500 Reactions to Obama's First 100 Days

Event Key Of Obama's First 100 Days

How Obama's First 100 Days Compare to Last 3 U.S. President's (S&P 500)

S&P 500 Companies With Best/Worst Returns During Obama's First 100 Days

Valuation Attractiveness of Top/Bottom 10 Companies in Obama's First 100 Days (Ex. Financials)

Valuation Model – Using AFG’s modified discounted cash flow model to measure the intrinsic value of a firm compared to its peers. AFG's Value Score - A score which represents the ranked percent to target (deviation between stock’s current trading price and AFG’s current default target price) or attractiveness (upside) relative to the universe. A Value Score of 100 is the most undervalued and 0 is the most overvalued company in the universe.

Since March 9, 2009, the S&P 500 experienced quite a recovery, going from 676 to 813, or just over a 17% rebound. To put that into perspective, the market historically delivered 8% average annual returns. In the table below we provide a list of the top and bottom 10 performers since the March 9th rebound began, to give you an idea of who the new Bulls and Bears are. In the list you will find each company’s attractiveness from a valuation standpoint, as well as an analysis of sales growth expectations imbedded in these companies’ stock prices. Compare the expectations for sales growth to what they have delivered historically to see which stocks on this list are most likely to meet or exceed those expectations, and thus be more likely to out-perform. This list contains companies from the S&P 500 excluding all financial companies.

Top & Bottom Returns (S&P 500 excluding financials) Since March 9, 2009

*Scott Goto Arts

*AFG’s Value Expectation allows us to understand the imbedded Sales Growth, EBITDA Margins, and Asset Turnovers a company has to deliver in the future to justify its current trading price. In theory and in normal circumstances, if the imbedded future performance is very conservative relative to the company’s historical performance, the stock is regarded as undervalued. The table displays the implied future sales growth of companies assuming their EBITDA margins and Asset turnovers stay at the 5 year median levels.

Below is Value Expectations’ analysis of the companies in the S&P 500 with the 10 best and 10 worst returns for 2009 YTD (excluding financial companies). Comparing the sales growth expectations priced in (VE sales growth) to what the company has delivered in sales growth historically allows us to see which firms have the most reasonable sales growth expectations implied by their current trading prices and thus are more likely to outperform. Will the companies with the best returns be able to maintain their momentum for the remainder of 2009? Will the companies with the worst returns be able to turn things around? We will track the S&P500 winners and losers in the year ahead and provide you with regular updates.

10 Worst S&P 500 Companies 2009 YTD

10 Best S&P 500 Companies 2009 YTD

*data as of close Feb. 20, 2009

*AFG’s Value Expectation allows us to understand the imbedded Sales Growth, EBITDA Margins, and Asset Turnovers a company has to deliver in the future to justify its current trading price. In theory and in normal circumstances, if the imbedded future performance is very conservative relative to the company’s historical performance, the stock is regarded as undervalued. The table displays the implied future sales growth of companies assuming their EBITDA margins and Asset turnovers stay at the 5 year median levels.

Nearly all of the biggest return earning companies in the S&P 500 are firms that have been beaten up over the past few months but have bounced back to provide the biggest return in the entire index for the month of December. These firms have ended 2008 on a high note and move into 2009 with what they hope to be sustainable momentum.

The list of companies in the S&P 500 with the worst returns in December had also been trending downward for the past few months but were unable to muster a year-end turnaround as those on the other list had been able accomplish. Many of the firms on this list have something to do with oil, as their stock prices have been highly correlated with the falling price of oil.

Compare the sales growth priced-in to justify the current stock price (VE Sales Growth), to what the company has been able to deliver the past 5 years in revenue growth (5 Year Median Sales Growth), to see which companies have reasonable expectations of achieving the Sales Growth priced-in. Companies with low expectations relative to what they have been able to achieve are more likely to out-perform.

Sales Growth Expectations for the Highest Return Companies (S&P 500) - December

**denotes only 2 years historical sales growth available (2 year median used)

Sales Growth Expectations for the Lowest Return Companies (S&P 500) - December

VE Sales Growth Calculated for these firms on 12/26/08.