HRS

The flowchart below outlines The Applied Finance Group’s custom screening process which takes into account several factors to screen on as well as provides step by step process to end up with the highest quality investment ideas. In Step 1 of AFG’s custom screening process we identified companies that were trading at a discount to their intrinsic value as AFG’s valuation process is a key component in the screening process. Today we will combine the criteria of looking for cheap companies with companies expected to improve their economic profitability (Economic Margins) as well. Economic Margins are highly correlated with market values and can provide investors an edge in their stock selection process if they have an understanding of a company’s true economic profitability. Our daily examples will show that an increase in margins typically leads to market out performance, where a decline in margins leads to market under performance.

The example we have provided is Harris Corporation (NYSE:HRS), a company that currently looks undervalued according to AFG’s default valuation model. An important fact to note is that AFG has shown it tracks Harris Corp. (NYSE:HRS) well (high accuracy score of 89). Also, Harris has a current AFG Value Score of 90, meaning the company ranks in the top 90th percentile of companies in the AFG universe in valuation attractiveness.

A highlight of the overall attractiveness of the Technology sector which currently looks to be trading at a discount to its historical relative valuation and looks undervalued relative to the market. The Tech sector also has consistently been voted the best sector to invest in over the next year by participants in our monthly survey of professional investors called The Market Forecast Project.

ValueExpectations.com emphasizes evaluating a company’s ability to earn a spread above their cost of capital using a very robust measure of corporate performance, Economic Margin. After evaluating a firm’s ability to create wealth VE.com then determines what price we are paying for the company using a modified discounted cash flow model. If we had to simplify performance, a very elementary way to evaluate performance can be Return on Invested Capital ROIC and valuation which can be simplified by using earnings yield. This is the approach Joel Grenblatt uses in his book, The Little Blue Book that Beats the Market.

In January VE.com highlighted a list of stocks based on Joel Greenblatt’s Magic Formula Investing Strategy from 1998-2004 Greenblatt’s simulated returns were 30.8% a year, relative to a 12.4% annual return for the S&P 500 and was only down in one year in that time-span.

In our article posted on January 9, 2009 we listed our best 30 “Magic Formula” companies which has earned returns comparable to the tests conducted by Mr. Greenblatt. From Jan. 9, 2009 to Dec. 14, 2009 the 30 companies we recommended from our “Magic Screen” have returned a solid 32.06% spread above the S&P 500. Since our last “Magic Formula” portfolio was successful we have decided to run the screen again for a new list of companies to see just how consistent this strategy is.

To stay updated on companies AFG believes are attractive investment opportunities register for ValueExpectations.com It's Fast and Free!

A look at Greenblatt’s formula for successful “Magic Formula Investing”:

1. Establish a minimum market capitalization (usually greater than $50 million).

2. Exclude utility and financial stocks

3. Exclude foreign companies (American Depositary Receipts)

4. Determine company's earnings yield = EBIT / enterprise value.

5. Determine company's return on capital = EBIT / (Net fixed assets + working capital)

6. Rank all companies above chosen market capitalization by highest earnings yield and highest return on capital (ranked as percentages).

7. Invest in 20-30 highest ranked companies, accumulating 2-3 positions per month over a 12-month period.

8. Re-balance portfolio once per year, selling losers one week before the year-mark and winners one week after the year mark.

9. Continue over long-term (3-5 year) period.

Mr. Greenblatt was a student of both Ben Graham and Warren Buffet and tried to include valuable insights from each investor in his “Magic Formula.” His Magic Formula was a screen that percentile ranked two variables: Return on Invested Capital (quality) and Earnings Yield (valuation). The idea is simple, buy the best companies at the best price and then hold on to them for one year. The Little Blue Book recommends selecting the top 30 firms from the “Magic Formula.” That formula ranks each company by variable and then puts a 50% weight on each.

Ticker  Company Name Sector Market Cap ROIC Earn Yield (NYSE:PM) Philip Morris Intl Inc Consumer Non Durable $96,066 265% 26% (NYSE:LO) Lorillard Inc Consumer Non Durable $12,671 111% 13% (NYSE:RAI) Reynolds American Inc Consumer Non Durable $15,560 116% 14% (NYSE:NOV) National Oilwell Varco Capital Goods $18,530 38% 17% (NYSE:ABC) Amerisource Bergen Corp Health $7,198 82% 12% (NASDAQ:APOL)  Apollo Group Inc Cl A Miscellaneous $9,602 164% 12% (NYSE:GD)  General Dynamics Corp Capital Goods $27,261 69% 12% (NYSE:BF.B)  Brown-Forman Corp Cl B Consumer Non Durable $8,335 124% 18% (NYSE:TSS)  Total System Services Consumer Services $3,439 50% 16% (NYSE:DNB)  Dun & Bradstreet Corp Consumer Services $4,285 -395% 10% (NYSE:LLL) L-3 Communications Hldgs Capital Goods $9,873 55% 12% (NYSE:MCK)  Mckesson Corp Health $16,880 43% 12% (NYSE:PFE) Pfizer Inc Health $148,488 17% 11% (NYSE:MO)  Altria Group Inc Consumer Non Durable $40,753 1693% 20% (NASDAQ:CEPH) Cephalon Inc Health $4,414 32% 12% (NYSE:OMC)   Omnicom Group Inc Consumer Services $11,681 -178% 10% (NYSE:DO) Diamond Offshre Drilling Capital Goods $13,503 37% 14% (NYSE:LLY)  Eli Lilly & Co Health $40,928 47% 15% (NYSE:SNI) Scripps Networks Intr In Consumer Services $6,692 77% 10% (NASDAQ:BIIB) Biogen Idec Inc Health $14,133 46% 11% (NYSE:FRX)  Forest Laboratories Inc Health $9,563 22% 13% (NYSE:RTN)  Raytheon Co Capital Goods $20,479 67% 14% (NYSE:DPS) Dr Pepper Snapple Grp Consumer Non Durable $7,131 71% 10% (NYSE:HRS) Harris Corp Technology $5,964 57% 11% (NYSE:MHP) Mcgraw-Hill Co Inc Consumer Services $10,886 129% 11% (NYSE:FLR) Fluor Corp Capital Goods $7,252 46% 20% (NYSE:LH)  Laboratory Cp Am Hldgs Health $7,961 108% 10% (NYSE:LH)  Moody'S Corp Consumer Services $6,281 -2400% 9% (NYSE:FLS) Flowserve Corp Capital Goods $5,398 40% 11% (NYSE:GME) Gamestop Corp Cl A Consumer Services $3,671 69% 17%

 

 Click Here - If you are a professional investor and would like a review of your portfolio by an AFG representative or to discuss companies AFG find attractive that fit your investment style.

To stay updated on companies AFG believes are attractive investment opportunities register for ValueExpectations.com It's Fast and Free! 

In recent weeks we have written several blogs (S&P 500 sector stock watch, Attractive stocks under $35, with potential investment opportunities, Solid S&P Value Companies, Cheapest Stocks In the S&P 500), discussing investment opportunities within the S&P 500. These stocks ideas all had favorable scores under The Applied Finance Group's (AFG’s) investment criteria, which includes economic performance, valuation, earnings quality and management’s ability to create shareholder wealth, among other criteria.

Another way that AFG identifies potentially attractive investments is through the use of its Value Expectations interface, which helps investors get a better understanding of the expectations embedded into stock prices. This interface allows us to understand the Sales Growth, EBITDA Margin, and Asset Turnover a company has to deliver in the future to justify its current trading price. In theory and in normal circumstances, if the imbedded future performance is very conservative relative to the company’s historical performance, the stock is regarded as undervalued. The table below displays the implied future Sales Growth (“Priced-in Sales Growth) of the companies we have recently recommended in our recent blogs, assuming their EBITDA Margins and Asset Turnovers stay at 5-year median levels.

Company Descriptors Sales Growth   Ebitda   Asset Turnover Exchange/Ticker Name Sector "Priced-in" Sales Growth 5 Year Median LFY   5 Year Median LFY   5 Year Median LFY (NYSE:ABT) ABBOTT LABORATORIES Health 6.32% 13.51% 13.94%   25.34% 24.83%   0.69 0.70 (NYSE:AEP)  AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER Utilities 9.53% 4.22% 7.92%   27.14% 28.82%   0.33 0.32 (NYSE:AES)  AES CORP THE Utilities -4.73% 12.73% 18.27%   34.66% 29.23%   0.39 0.46 (NASDAQ:APOL) APOLLO GROUP INC CL A Miscellaneous -2.48% 15.31% 15.31%   28.46% 25.59%   1.71 1.69 (NYSE:AZO) AUTOZONE INC Consumer Services -8.92% 3.72% 5.72%   19.59% 19.72%   1.33 1.24 (NYSE:BIG)  BIG LOTS INC Consumer Services 15.47% 1.25% -0.24%   5.44% 6.86%   2.74 3.24 (NYSE:BMY)  BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO Health -1.23% -0.89% 6.46%   24.98% 22.84%   0.70 0.70 (NYSE:BSX)  BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP Health 5.14% 11.72% -3.67%   28.70% 27.68%   0.45 0.30 (NYSE:CAG)  CONAGRA FOODS Consumer Non Durable 23.23% 0.31% 9.70%   11.31% 10.74%   1.02 1.15 (NASDAQ:CEPH)  CEPHALON INC Health -5.73% 19.35% 11.40%   26.65% 26.37%   0.47 0.62 (NYSE:DNB) DUN & BRADSTREET CORP Consumer Services -18.53% 4.43% 7.95%   30.41% 32.09%   0.93 1.09 (NYSE:DPS)  DR PEPPER SNAPPLE GRP Consumer Non Durable 15.11% 10.36% -0.66%   20.60% 20.60%   0.55 0.66 (NYSE:DRI)  DARDEN RESTAURANTS Consumer Services -1.78% 8.38% 8.92%   13.02% 12.80%   1.80 1.44 (NASDAQ:ERTS) ELECTRONIC ARTS INC Technology 2.34% 5.81% 14.93%   10.99% -2.24%   0.69 0.90 (NYSE:FIS) FIDELITY NATIONAL INFO Consumer Services -7.42% 7.47% -27.57%   23.50% 26.76%   0.83 0.46 (NASDAQ:FISV)  FISERV INC Miscellaneous 14.41% 11.94% 20.83%   22.99% 23.53%   0.48 0.51 (NYSE:HAS)  HASBRO INC Consumer Durable 2.47% 3.01% 4.79%   16.31% 17.62%   1.00 1.27 (NYSE:HRS)  HARRIS CORP Technology -1.48% 19.14% -5.76%   15.24% 15.96%   1.13 1.12 (NYSE:KR)  KROGER CO THE Consumer Services 4.51% 7.30% 8.21%   5.31% 5.21%   3.04 3.27 (NYSE:LO)  LORILLARD INC Consumer Non Durable -5.09% 5.62% 5.92%   33.08% 32.55%   1.44 1.81 (NYSE:NOC)  NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP Capital Goods 1.10% 5.84% 5.84%   9.99% 11.63%   0.92 1.12 (NYSE:PEG)  PUBLIC SVC ENTPRS GROUP Utilities 7.72% 3.65% 3.65%   24.57% 30.23%   0.42 0.46 (NYSE:PFE)  PFIZER INC Health -4.75% -0.25% -0.25%   40.22% 32.09%   0.42 0.43 (NYSE:PM) PHILIP MORRIS INTL INC Consumer Non Durable 18.90% -10.87% -53.35%   18.26% 17.37%   1.78 0.78 (NYSE:RDC)  ROWAN COMPANIES INC Capital Goods -20.68% 38.68% 5.62%   33.16% 38.76%   0.40 0.49 (NYSE:S)  SPRINT NEXTEL CORP Technology -13.65% 18.30% -11.24%   29.59% 25.61%   0.62 0.61 (NYSE:SEE)  SEALED AIR CORP Basic Material -3.95% 7.47% 4.13%   16.64% 15.47%   0.85 0.97 (NYSE:STZ)   CONSTELLATION BRANDS INC Consumer Non Durable 23.76% 12.62% -3.14%   17.06% 16.97%   0.54 0.45 (NASDAQ:SYMC)  SYMANTEC CORP Technology 6.36% 25.49% 4.69%   30.39% 27.15%   0.37 0.58 (NYSE:TAP)  MOLSON COORS BREWING CLB Consumer Non Durable 14.61% 6.14% -22.88%   17.95% 17.83%   0.49 0.46 (NYSE:TMO)  THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC Health 7.08% 19.36% 7.71%   14.90% 18.20%   0.56 0.50 (NYSE:TSO)  TESORO CORPORATION Energy and Extraction -47.31% 29.18% 29.18%   6.76% 6.19%   3.04 3.81 (NYSE:VZ) VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS Technology 2.94% 5.37% 4.16%   32.18% 32.05%   0.46 0.48 (NYSE:WAT)  WATERS CORP Capital Goods 5.94% 10.53% 6.93%   28.15% 27.30%   0.80 0.97

Fidelity has a fund called the Low Priced Stock fund that only contains stocks with a price of below $35 a share which has been successful in the past. Following a similar strategy ValueExpectations.com has published 2 articles containing attractive stocks under $35 as a starting place for investor’s looking for potential investment opportunities. The first low priced stock strategy blog outpaced the S&P 500 by over 58% since release in February the second article released in June has slightly underperformed the S&P 500 by -1.26%. Since this strategy has been well received by VE readers we decided to provide a new list of attractive stocks using the same strategy.  Below is a list of S&P500 stocks that are currently trading under $35 a share that have passed through AFG’s investment criteria which looks for companies ranked in the top half of their sector in valuation, economic performance, management quality and earnings quality. All of the companies listed scored well in all of the required variables for AFG to deem a company attractive and backtests will show that all of these variables deliver a significant spread in performance between those that AFG sees as unattractive vs. those that look attractive from an AFG standpoint.  To analyze your holdings using AFG’s research process click here.

AFG Rank within Sector Ticker Name Sector Investment Opportunity Valuation Signal EM Change Signal   (NYSE: BMY) BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO Health Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE: HRS) HARRIS CORP Technology Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE: AEP) AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER Utilities Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE: VZ) VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS Technology Attractive Attractive Positive (NASDAQ:ERTS)  ELECTRONIC ARTS INC Technology Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE:STZ)  CONSTELLATION BRANDS INC Consumer Non Durable Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE:BSX)  BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP Health Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE:SEE)  SEALED AIR CORP Basic Material Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE:CAG) CONAGRA FOODS Consumer Non Durable Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE:BIG) BIG LOTS INC Consumer Services Attractive Attractive Positive

AFG's Valuation Metric – Measures the percent to target (deviation between a stock’s current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model (modified discounted cash flow model).

Economic Margin - A corporate performance measurement that addresses the gaps in GAAP, eliminating distortions caused by accounting policies to measure what a company is truly earning above or below their cost of capital.

Management Quality – Assesses management’s ability to make wealth creating decisions.

Investors are always looking for an edge, a way to improve their stock selection process in the hope that it improves their overall performance. Fundamental investors may flirt with the idea of adding a technical overlay to their process while a value investor may take more of a chance on a growth company. No matter what style of investor you are, you want to be sure the process you are implementing makes sense.

Because of the volatility of the market, investors seem to be paying more attention to the technicals of the companies they hold or are considering to buy. While there are several ways technical analysts look at the momentum in the market, ValueExpectations.com will concentrate on the simple, yet widely used 50 and 200 day moving averages relative to a companies current trading price.

We, at The Applied Finance Group (AFG), believe that technicals are relevant, but it is much more important to focus on the fundamentals of a company in determining which securities are over/under valued. We have taken the S&P 500 and focused only on the stocks trading above their 50 and 200 day moving averages (44%) for those investors who pay closer attention to technicals, and provided a list of companies in most of the major economic sectors that we find attractive and some that we find unattractive based on AFG’s investment criteria, which focuses more on valuation attractiveness and expected corporate performance.

However, if you do look at momentum, a variable we would suggest concentrating on is economic momentum. AFG’s economic momentum coupled with valuation give you a tremendous advantage in outperforming!

		AFG	Rank within Sector
Ticker	Name	Investment Opportunity	Valuation Signal	EM Change Signal
Capital Goods - Attractive
(NYSE:RDC)	ROWAN COMPANIES INC	Attractive	Attractive	Positive
(NYSE:DO)	DIAMOND OFFSHRE DRILLING	Attractive	Attractive	Positive
Capital Goods - Unattractive
(NYSE:SWK)	STANLEY WORKS THE	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative
(NYSE:LEN)	LENNAR CORP CL A	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative
Consumer Durable - Attractive
(NYSE:OI)	OWENS ILLINOIS INC	Attractive	Neutral	Positive
(NYSE:XRX)	XEROX CORP	Attractive	Attractive	Neutral
Consumer Durable - Unattractive
(NYSE:IGT)	INTERNAT GAME TECHNOLOGY	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative
(NYSE:HAR)	HARMAN INTERNAT IND INC	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative
Consumer NonDurable - Attractive
(NYSE:LO)	LORILLARD INC	Attractive	Attractive	Positive
(NYSE:CL)	COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO	Attractive	Attractive	Positive
Consumer NonDurable - Unattractive
(NYSE:RL)	POLO RALPH LAUREN CORP	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative
(NYSE:HNZ)	H.J. HEINZ CO	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative
Consumer Services - Attractive
(NYSE:DRI)	DARDEN RESTAURANTS	Attractive	Attractive	Positive
(NYSE:EFX)	EQUIFAX INC	Attractive	Attractive	Positive
Consumer Services - Unattractive
(NYSE:HOT)	STARWOOD HTLS & RSRTS WW	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative
(NYSE:CBS)	CBS CORP CL B	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative
Health - Attractive
(NASDAQ:BIIB)	BIOGEN IDEC INC	Attractive	Attractive	Positive
(NYSE:PFE)	PFIZER INC	Attractive	Attractive	Positive
Health - Unattractive
(NASDAQ:MYL)	MYLAN INC	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative
(NASDAQ:ISRG)	INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative
Technology - Attractive
(NASDAQ:SYMC)	SYMANTEC CORP	Attractive	Attractive	Positive
(NYSE:HRS)	HARRIS CORP	Attractive	Attractive	Positive
Technology - Unattractive
(NASDAQ:LLTC)	LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORP	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative
(NASDAQ:CIEN)	CIENA CORP	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative
Utilities - Attractive
(NYSE:PEG)	PUBLIC SVC ENTPRS GROUP	Attractive	Attractive	Positive
(NYSE:D)	DOMINION RESOURCES VA	Attractive	Attractive	Positive
Utilities - Unattractive
(NYSE:NI)	NISOURCE INC	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative
(NYSE:NU)	NORTHEAST UTILITIES	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative

 

Sectors without adequate representation were excluded (Financials, Basic Material, Transportation)

Below is a chart and table outlining the 2009 year to date performance of the sectors within the S&P 500. The Technology sector has lead the way thus-far while Utilities and Financials have been dragging down the overall average of the index. As previously reported in our Market Forecast Project, Technology was also voted most attractive sector according to our survery of professional investors. These sectors are based on the sector classification created by The Applied Finance Group.

Source(The Applied Finance Group)

Source(The Applied Finance Group)

 

Ticker	Name	Sector	Attractiveness	Valuation	EM Change
Attractive Technology Companies - S&P 500
HRS	HARRIS CORP	Technology	Attractive	Attractive	Positive
IBM	INTERNAT BUSINESS MACHNS	Technology	Attractive	Attractive	Positive
ORCL	ORACLE CORP	Technology	Attractive	Attractive	Positive
WDC	WESTERN DIGITAL CORP	Technology	Attractive	Attractive	Negative
HPQ	HEWLETT-PACKARD CO	Technology	Attractive	Attractive	Negative
Unattractive Technology Companies - S&P 500
AMAT	APPLIED MATERIALS INC	Technology	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative
JDSU	JDS UNIPHASE CORP	Technology	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative
KLAC	KLA-TENCOR CORP	Technology	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative
MU	MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC	Technology	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative
CIEN	CIENA CORP	Technology	Unattractive	Unattractive	Negative

Source(The Applied Finance Group)

*Valuation & EM Change are Ranks within their sector

 

AFG's Buy/Sell Criteria - factors in Economic Margin, Management Quality, and AFG's Valuation Metric. In order to determine Management Quality, AFG scores management on their growth decisions in accordance with the company’s ability to either create or destroy wealth. AFG's Valuation Metric measures a company's Percent to Target (the deviation between a stock's current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model.

What is the most attractive sector? That's one of the questions we asked a group of professional investors in our Market Forecast Project. The answer varied from person to person, but there was a general consensus.  The majority was in favor of Technology, which pulled away by far with 41 of a possible 98 first place votes. Survey participants were asked to rank a list of sectors from 1-11 in order of how attractive they found that sector to be over the next 12 months. Technology ranked highest with an average ranking of 2.7, well ahead of the rest; Basic Material placed second with an average rank of 4.8. We've put together a list below of both attractive and unattractive companies within the Technology sector.  It may be worthwhile to take a closer look at the companies listed. If the insight provided by the survey’s investment professionals holds true, you could be among those who outperform the market.

Market Forecast Sector Ranking Results
15. Rank Order, which sector seems most attractive to you over the next 12 months?
(1 = Most attractive)

Results Have Been Ranked by Most Attractive

                                                                                              1 Technology
                                                                                              2 Basic material
                                                                                              3 Energy & extraction 
                                                                                              4 Health
                                                                                              5 Capital goods 
                                                                                              6 Consumer non-durable 
                                                                                              7 Financials
                                                                                              8 Consumer services 
                                                                                              9 Consumer durable
                                                                                              10 Transportation
                                                                                              11 Utilities

10 Attractive Technology Stocks


10 Unattractive Technology Stocks

 

AFG's Buy/Sell Criteria - factors in Economic Margin, Management Quality, and AFG's Valuation Metric. In order to determine Management Quality, AFG scores management on their growth decisions in accordance with the company’s ability to either create or destroy wealth. AFG's Valuation Metric measures a company's Percent to Target (the deviation between a stock's current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model.

AFG's Valuation Metric – Measures the percent to target (deviation between a stock’s current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model (modified discounted cash flow model).

Yesterday we provided a list of 10 companies and asked our readers to comment on which they liked and which they did not to see how good VE.com readers are at separating the wheat from the chaff. Listed below are the same 10 companies listed in order of attractiveness (most attractive at the top, least attractive at the bottom) to give our readers an idea of our take on these companies to compare with your own thoughts.

source: www.economicmargin.com

Investment Insights from your peers, Professional Investors - The Applied Finance Group would like to invite professional investors to join AFG’s Market Forecast Project so you can better understand what your peers currently think about the market and cultivate the “wisdom of Crowds” into actionable investment ideas and themes. 
Click here to learn more

We think 5 of the companies listed below currently look attractive as potential investment opportunities and 5 that look like potential torpedoes. Share your thoughts on which of these companies you like and those that you don't. We will share our thoughts on all 10 tomorrow.

What are your thoughts on these 10 companies?

source: www.economicmargin.com

Investment Insights from your peers, Professional Investors - The Applied Finance Group would like to invite professional investors to join AFG’s Market Forecast Project so you can better understand what your peers currently think about the market and cultivate the “wisdom of Crowds” into actionable investment ideas and themes. 
Click here to learn more

When analysts and market pundits come on tv to talk about stock picks, they usually talk about the "P/E" ratio (Price to Earnings) being attractive.  However if you're investing in stocks and you only look at the "P/E" ratio, you might be walking into a "Value Trap".  Investors ignore half the valuation picture when investors only concentrate on P/E as investors also need to consider the growth potential of the company and what investments are needed to get the earnings.  The Applied Finance Group (AFG) has developed a process that incorporates these factors easily into the valuation framework.  Using AFG’s Valuation Metric, we have compiled a list of 20 companies with low P/E, 10 of which we consider attractive investments, and 10 of which we consider Value Traps.

By using AFG's Economic Margin framework instead of earnings alone, investors capture the true net cash flow the entire firm is generating. It is not uncommon for companies to grow P/E while having declining EM’s. This occurs when the cost for the investment required to yield the increasing P/E is more than the cash flow generated from the investment. By analyzing a company’s EMs through time, investors gain a more accurate account of levels and changes in a company’s current profitability and value.

If earnings are a true proxy for performance, there should be a correlation between a company growing earnings and its price to earnings ratio. As a surprise to many investors, there is actually little to no correlation between earnings growth and price to earnings ratios (see chart below).
 

P/E is determined by taking a stock’s price and dividing it by the last four quarter’s worth of earnings. P/E alone should not be used to value companies. P/E does not look at a company’s balance sheet thus we do not know what the costs of generating those earnings. While the P/E is determined by looking at a company’s past performance, EM bases a company’s value off its future projections. By using EM, an investor can know how their stocks are likely to perform, allowing them to clearly evaluate where to invest.

Successful companies measure results, make decisions and set strategy with the goal of creating value. A company’s performance measures must serve as a proxy for its market value creation. While important, S-T Earnings alone are a poor indicator of a company’s value, due to what they do not measure.
 

Economic Margin is a more complete performance measure for companies to use to guide performance and motivate employees. Executives consider Cash Flow, Investment, Competition & Risk when setting strategy. The above charts show that investors do the same.

AFG's Valuation Metric – Measures the percent to target (deviation between a stock’s current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model (modified discounted cash flow model).

Economic Margin - A corporate performance measurement that addresses the gaps in GAAP, eliminating distortions caused by accounting policies to measure what a company is truly earning above or below their cost of capital.

Investment Insights from your peers, Professional Investors - The Applied Finance Group would like to invite professional investors to join AFG’s Market Forecast Project so you can better understand what your peers currently think about the market and cultivate the “wisdom of Crowds” into actionable investment ideas and themes. 
Click here to learn more

The Applied Finance Group’s (AFG’s) Economic Margin (EM) methodology helps investors understand what a company earns above its true cost of capital or how profitable a firm is. Companies expected to improve their Economic Margins have proven to be more likely to outperform than companies with expected EM declines. The table below provides 10 stocks expected to improve their Economic Margins in the next fiscal year and look attractive from a valuation perspective according to AFG’s valuation model. All 10 of these firms also currently have a default buy recommendation and look to have considerable long-term upside.

S&P 500 - Stocks to Watch (ex. Financials)

 

AFG's default valuation is a great place to start when looking for potential equity investments as our valuation techniques have proven successful through time at identifying mispriced securities and helping our clients identify investment opportunities resulting in outperforming their chosen benchmark.

AFG's Valuation Model – Using AFG’s modified discounted cash flow model to measure the intrinsic value of a firm compared to its peers. AFG's Value Score - A score which represents the ranked percent to target (deviation between stock’s current trading price and AFG’s current default target price) or attractiveness (upside) relative to the universe. A Value Score of 100 is the most undervalued and 0 is the most overvalued company in the universe.

All companies listed below met The Applied Finance Group's (AFG's) Buy screen criteria and are in the bottom half of their sector in Market Value/Invested Capital (MV/IC), which by definition qualifies the companies as part of the AFG Value Universe. When identifying buy ideas, AFG looks for companies with the most valuation upside compared to their sector peers, above sector median expected Economic Margin change, and a management quality score that reflects a management team following a wealth creating strategy.

 

9 Value Companies To Watch

A brief description of AFG's buy criteria variables:

AFG's Valuation Metric – Measures the percent to target (deviation between a stock’s current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model (modified discounted cash flow model).

Economic Margin - A corporate performance measurement that addresses the gaps in GAAP, eliminating distortions caused by accounting policies to measure what a company is truly earning above or below their cost of capital.

Management Quality– Assesses management’s ability to make wealth creating decisions.
AFG's Value Universe - Companies in the AFG universe, which have MV/IC at the bottom 50% of the universe and have EPS estimates.

Market Value/Invested Capital (MV/IC) - The firm's average total equity, debt and other obligations divided by net invested capital.

Bloomberg provides a score for companies within the S&P 500 based on an average of all analyst ratings from the street. Below is a table highlighting companies with the best analyst ratings, largest increase in rating, highest price targets, and worst analyst ratings and the valuation attractiveness of each of these companies based on The Applied Finance Group’s (AFG) valuation model.

Companies within each of these groups are ranked from most attractive from a valuation perspective to the least attractive. VE.com will actively track the performance of these recommendations and see how they stack up to the analyst recommendations in each group. AFGview.com, AFG’s professional investor website allows you to compare any company using their rating versus the consensus ratings of the sell side. If you are interested in an analysis on a specific company, contact afgsales@afgltd.com.

 

Best/Worst Analyst Rated Companies (Bloomberg)

 

AFG's Valuation Model – Using AFG’s modified discounted cash flow model to measure the intrinsic value of a firm compared to its peers. AFG's Value Score - A score which represents the ranked percent to target (deviation between stock’s current trading price and AFG’s current default target price) or attractiveness (upside) relative to the universe. A Value Score of 100 is the most undervalued and 0 is the most overvalued company in the universe.