BMY

A list of attractive stocks from within the Health sector that meet AFG’s definition of attractive based on Valuation, Corporate Performance, Management Quality and other key criteria AFG uses to identify the stocks that are most likely to outperform from within each sector. The Health sector has consistently ranked as the 2nd best sector to invest in (next to Technology) over the next year according to participants of The Market Forecast Project, a monthly survey of professional money managers.

To identify potentially attractive investment ideas, The Applied Finance Group (AFG) usually uses a combination of proprietary variables to develop a focused group of potential buy ideas that meet criteria based on valuation, economic performance, management quality, and earnings quality. Although this set of investment criteria has proven successful in generating buy ideas, AFG’s valuation on a standalone basis has consistently been able to identify mispriced securities and investment opportunities that outperform their chosen benchmark.

Several times over the last year ValueExpectations.com has released lists of companies narrowed only by the valuation properties of the company using AFG’s Value Score (defined below). Today, we will revisit these blog posts and compare the performance results of the companies previously identified to the results of their benchmarks.

Below is an update of the performance of the articles we have released where companies were identified by using AFG's valuation metric as the sole variable. Included in this table is the blog portfolio's performance, the performance of the index, and the spread relative to the index. The performance of all portfolios and their benchmarks are tracked from the date of the blog's release until last Friday's close. As you can see in the table below, companies identified by AFG as having an attractive valuation have performed quite well and have consistently outperformed their benchmarks.

If you are a professional investor and would like to better understand and access AFG's valuation metric to review your portfolio - Click Here

 

Below is an updated list of the S&P 500 companies with the most attractive valuations according to AFG’s valuation model including Freeport McMoran C&G (NYSE:FCX) and Fluor Corp. (NYSE:FLR).

To stay updated on companies AFG believes are attractive investment opportunities register for ValueExpectations.com It's Fast and Free!

AFG Investment Rank within Sector Ticker Name Sector  Opportunity Valuation Signal  Cheapest Stocks In The S&P 500 (NYSE:FCX)  FREEPORT-MCMORAN C & G Basic Material Attractive Attractive (NYSE:WAT)  WATERS CORP Capital Goods Attractive Attractive (NYSE:FLR)  FLUOR CORP Capital Goods Attractive Attractive (NYSE:TAP)  MOLSON COORS BREWING CLB Consumer Non Durable Attractive Attractive (NYSE:CL) COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO Consumer Non Durable Attractive Attractive (NYSE:DNB) DUN & BRADSTREET CORP Consumer Services Attractive Attractive (NASDAQ:BIIB) BIOGEN IDEC INC Health Attractive Attractive (NYSE:PFE) PFIZER INC Health Attractive Attractive (NYSE:BMY)  BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO Health Attractive Attractive (NYSE:IBM) INTERNAT BUSINESS MACHNS Technology Attractive Attractive

 Click Here - If you are a professional investor and would like a review of your portfolio by an AFG representative or to discuss companies AFG find attractive that fit your investment style.

Applied Finance Group’s (AFG’s) Value Score defined - A score which represents the ranked percent to target (deviation between stock’s current trading price and AFG’s current default target price) or attractiveness (upside) relative to the universe. A Value Score of 100 is the most undervalued and 0 is the most overvalued company in the universe.

To stay updated on companies AFG believes are attractive investment opportunities register for ValueExpectations.com It's Fast and Free!

About the AFG Screener

Professional investors have many ways to screen and narrow their list of constituents to create a focus list of companies they use to select from to develop their portfolios. In the industry, there are many screeners that are part of subscriptions to databases and investment tools, however, many of them do not provide guidance on the best screening methods to use. Created by The Applied Finance Group (AFG), the AFG Screener tool is a web-based company-screening application located on AFGView.com that is designed to save you time when narrowing your list of constituents. More importantly, AFG’s screener allows you to use proprietary variables that have been proven to outperform, helping investors make better investment decisions.

AFG’s Screener allows clients to find aggregate groups of companies that meet specific criteria from AFG’s entire global universe of over 14,000 securities. Using the Screener, one can find a list of companies that either match one of AFG’s preset screens or one based on a customized screen that you create.

The AFG Screener identifies attractive valuations, strong management teams, corporate performance, and the quality of earnings of a company as well as all traditional financial variables,

Because AFG’s Screener is web-based, clients can gain access from anywhere that has an internet connection, convenience and ease of “one-click screening” with our default screens, various forms of result presentations, and compatibility with Microsoft Excel for further analysis.

How to Use AFG’s Screener

Access AFG custom built screens that many clients regularly utilize that include AFG’s proprietary Economic Margin (EM), valuation and management quality variables along with many others.

Build your own custom screens using any variables you are familiar with such as price multiples and other accounting information by themselves or coupled with powerful AFG variables with just a few clicks of the mouse.

Once you have narrowed your list of constituents to those companies that meet your specific criteria you can easily upload your new list into AFG’s valuation model to analyze each company in greater detail or see how they rank vs. their peers on key AFG variables.

Default / Custom Screens

Whenever a new user is introduced to AFG’s Screener, they are provided with two default screens – AFG’s Default Buy screen and AFG’s Default Sell screen. Using these screens, one can filter companies based on AFG’s buy/sell criteria.

However, the AFG Screener is very intuitive allowing clients to create their own screens based on custom criteria. There are countless combinations that can be used to create a custom screens, as there are over 600 variables to choose from. AFG’s Screener tool can be used to list companies based on Indexes, Sectors, Industries, and previously created Portfolios.

Using Excel / Further Research

AFG screens can also be accessed using AFG’s Excel add-in to combine results with other spreadsheets or to create a report for your investment team. Exporting your information will give you more freedom to read, organize and document your data as well as pull in other variables within AFG’s Excel add-in to easily rank order your list of companies based on the same variables available within the screener.

Example Screen:

Below is a list of 12 companies that resulted from a quick screen that sought to identify those companies within the S&P 500 with attractive valuations, market cap above $1 billion, expected to improve EMs greater than sector peers, and that have a current stock price of under $30. Improving EMS and an attractive default AFG valuation rank is a good place to start when looking for the companies most likely to outperform. This is just one simple example of the capabilities of using AFG’s screener tool to select a focused list of stocks that are the most likely to outperform and a list that is worthy of more time spent on due diligence on the companies that meet the specified criteria.

 

The Applied Finance Group would also  like to invite professional investors to join AFG’s Market Forecast Project so you can better understand what your peers currently think about the market and cultivate the “wisdom of Crowds” into actionable investment ideas and themes.

Register to View Complete Market Review and Sector Analysis, it's FAST and FREE!

In recent weeks we have written several blogs (S&P 500 sector stock watch, Attractive stocks under $35, with potential investment opportunities, Solid S&P Value Companies, Cheapest Stocks In the S&P 500), discussing investment opportunities within the S&P 500. These stocks ideas all had favorable scores under The Applied Finance Group's (AFG’s) investment criteria, which includes economic performance, valuation, earnings quality and management’s ability to create shareholder wealth, among other criteria.

Another way that AFG identifies potentially attractive investments is through the use of its Value Expectations interface, which helps investors get a better understanding of the expectations embedded into stock prices. This interface allows us to understand the Sales Growth, EBITDA Margin, and Asset Turnover a company has to deliver in the future to justify its current trading price. In theory and in normal circumstances, if the imbedded future performance is very conservative relative to the company’s historical performance, the stock is regarded as undervalued. The table below displays the implied future Sales Growth (“Priced-in Sales Growth) of the companies we have recently recommended in our recent blogs, assuming their EBITDA Margins and Asset Turnovers stay at 5-year median levels.

Company Descriptors Sales Growth   Ebitda   Asset Turnover Exchange/Ticker Name Sector "Priced-in" Sales Growth 5 Year Median LFY   5 Year Median LFY   5 Year Median LFY (NYSE:ABT) ABBOTT LABORATORIES Health 6.32% 13.51% 13.94%   25.34% 24.83%   0.69 0.70 (NYSE:AEP)  AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER Utilities 9.53% 4.22% 7.92%   27.14% 28.82%   0.33 0.32 (NYSE:AES)  AES CORP THE Utilities -4.73% 12.73% 18.27%   34.66% 29.23%   0.39 0.46 (NASDAQ:APOL) APOLLO GROUP INC CL A Miscellaneous -2.48% 15.31% 15.31%   28.46% 25.59%   1.71 1.69 (NYSE:AZO) AUTOZONE INC Consumer Services -8.92% 3.72% 5.72%   19.59% 19.72%   1.33 1.24 (NYSE:BIG)  BIG LOTS INC Consumer Services 15.47% 1.25% -0.24%   5.44% 6.86%   2.74 3.24 (NYSE:BMY)  BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO Health -1.23% -0.89% 6.46%   24.98% 22.84%   0.70 0.70 (NYSE:BSX)  BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP Health 5.14% 11.72% -3.67%   28.70% 27.68%   0.45 0.30 (NYSE:CAG)  CONAGRA FOODS Consumer Non Durable 23.23% 0.31% 9.70%   11.31% 10.74%   1.02 1.15 (NASDAQ:CEPH)  CEPHALON INC Health -5.73% 19.35% 11.40%   26.65% 26.37%   0.47 0.62 (NYSE:DNB) DUN & BRADSTREET CORP Consumer Services -18.53% 4.43% 7.95%   30.41% 32.09%   0.93 1.09 (NYSE:DPS)  DR PEPPER SNAPPLE GRP Consumer Non Durable 15.11% 10.36% -0.66%   20.60% 20.60%   0.55 0.66 (NYSE:DRI)  DARDEN RESTAURANTS Consumer Services -1.78% 8.38% 8.92%   13.02% 12.80%   1.80 1.44 (NASDAQ:ERTS) ELECTRONIC ARTS INC Technology 2.34% 5.81% 14.93%   10.99% -2.24%   0.69 0.90 (NYSE:FIS) FIDELITY NATIONAL INFO Consumer Services -7.42% 7.47% -27.57%   23.50% 26.76%   0.83 0.46 (NASDAQ:FISV)  FISERV INC Miscellaneous 14.41% 11.94% 20.83%   22.99% 23.53%   0.48 0.51 (NYSE:HAS)  HASBRO INC Consumer Durable 2.47% 3.01% 4.79%   16.31% 17.62%   1.00 1.27 (NYSE:HRS)  HARRIS CORP Technology -1.48% 19.14% -5.76%   15.24% 15.96%   1.13 1.12 (NYSE:KR)  KROGER CO THE Consumer Services 4.51% 7.30% 8.21%   5.31% 5.21%   3.04 3.27 (NYSE:LO)  LORILLARD INC Consumer Non Durable -5.09% 5.62% 5.92%   33.08% 32.55%   1.44 1.81 (NYSE:NOC)  NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP Capital Goods 1.10% 5.84% 5.84%   9.99% 11.63%   0.92 1.12 (NYSE:PEG)  PUBLIC SVC ENTPRS GROUP Utilities 7.72% 3.65% 3.65%   24.57% 30.23%   0.42 0.46 (NYSE:PFE)  PFIZER INC Health -4.75% -0.25% -0.25%   40.22% 32.09%   0.42 0.43 (NYSE:PM) PHILIP MORRIS INTL INC Consumer Non Durable 18.90% -10.87% -53.35%   18.26% 17.37%   1.78 0.78 (NYSE:RDC)  ROWAN COMPANIES INC Capital Goods -20.68% 38.68% 5.62%   33.16% 38.76%   0.40 0.49 (NYSE:S)  SPRINT NEXTEL CORP Technology -13.65% 18.30% -11.24%   29.59% 25.61%   0.62 0.61 (NYSE:SEE)  SEALED AIR CORP Basic Material -3.95% 7.47% 4.13%   16.64% 15.47%   0.85 0.97 (NYSE:STZ)   CONSTELLATION BRANDS INC Consumer Non Durable 23.76% 12.62% -3.14%   17.06% 16.97%   0.54 0.45 (NASDAQ:SYMC)  SYMANTEC CORP Technology 6.36% 25.49% 4.69%   30.39% 27.15%   0.37 0.58 (NYSE:TAP)  MOLSON COORS BREWING CLB Consumer Non Durable 14.61% 6.14% -22.88%   17.95% 17.83%   0.49 0.46 (NYSE:TMO)  THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC Health 7.08% 19.36% 7.71%   14.90% 18.20%   0.56 0.50 (NYSE:TSO)  TESORO CORPORATION Energy and Extraction -47.31% 29.18% 29.18%   6.76% 6.19%   3.04 3.81 (NYSE:VZ) VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS Technology 2.94% 5.37% 4.16%   32.18% 32.05%   0.46 0.48 (NYSE:WAT)  WATERS CORP Capital Goods 5.94% 10.53% 6.93%   28.15% 27.30%   0.80 0.97

Fidelity has a fund called the Low Priced Stock fund that only contains stocks with a price of below $35 a share which has been successful in the past. Following a similar strategy ValueExpectations.com has published 2 articles containing attractive stocks under $35 as a starting place for investor’s looking for potential investment opportunities. The first low priced stock strategy blog outpaced the S&P 500 by over 58% since release in February the second article released in June has slightly underperformed the S&P 500 by -1.26%. Since this strategy has been well received by VE readers we decided to provide a new list of attractive stocks using the same strategy.  Below is a list of S&P500 stocks that are currently trading under $35 a share that have passed through AFG’s investment criteria which looks for companies ranked in the top half of their sector in valuation, economic performance, management quality and earnings quality. All of the companies listed scored well in all of the required variables for AFG to deem a company attractive and backtests will show that all of these variables deliver a significant spread in performance between those that AFG sees as unattractive vs. those that look attractive from an AFG standpoint.  To analyze your holdings using AFG’s research process click here.

AFG Rank within Sector Ticker Name Sector Investment Opportunity Valuation Signal EM Change Signal   (NYSE: BMY) BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO Health Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE: HRS) HARRIS CORP Technology Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE: AEP) AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER Utilities Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE: VZ) VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS Technology Attractive Attractive Positive (NASDAQ:ERTS)  ELECTRONIC ARTS INC Technology Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE:STZ)  CONSTELLATION BRANDS INC Consumer Non Durable Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE:BSX)  BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP Health Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE:SEE)  SEALED AIR CORP Basic Material Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE:CAG) CONAGRA FOODS Consumer Non Durable Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE:BIG) BIG LOTS INC Consumer Services Attractive Attractive Positive

AFG's Valuation Metric – Measures the percent to target (deviation between a stock’s current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model (modified discounted cash flow model).

Economic Margin - A corporate performance measurement that addresses the gaps in GAAP, eliminating distortions caused by accounting policies to measure what a company is truly earning above or below their cost of capital.

Management Quality – Assesses management’s ability to make wealth creating decisions.

Understanding the amount of accruals a company has on its books and the quality of its reported earnings is especially important during earnings season, as poor earnings quality companies are more likely to have negative earnings surprises and underperform as a result. With so many companies reporting earnings this week, we wanted to share an analysis of their earnings quality based on The Applied Finance Group’s Earnings Quality score. AFG’s Earnings Quality variable is based on the concept of accruals and is an important indicator, which helps to differentiate between companies with poor and high quality of reported earnings. Watch out for firms with poor EQ score – make sure they are not trying to pad their sales numbers through channel stuffing, for example.

 

*Source: www.afgview.com

 

Two ways to approach accruals:

1. Cash Flow Statement
•Difference between Net Income and Cash Flow

2. Balance Sheet
•Change in Net Operating Assets from Period t-1 to t
•Net Operating Asset equals Total Assets Less Cash, Less Non-Debt Liabilities (excl. Minority Interest)
• Our studies show that the Balance Sheet approach is superior to the Cash Flow Statement approach.
• We found the Balance Sheet approach is also easier to expand to international companies.
• Low Accrual companies outperform high accrual companies
 

 Here is a look at how well the Earnings Quality variable works when you split top half vs. bottom half in each sector/style universe.

Source: AFGView client databases from 9/1998 - 5/2009   Universe size: 4,000 to 5,500 firms

 

Here is a look at an example of a poor Earnings Quality company that has a negative earning surprise and thus underperforms.

Eastman Kodak

• Other Liabilities declined in Q308, leading to high accruals – change in licensing agreement required immediate recognition of deferred revenue.
• Eastman Kodak (EK) subsequently missed earnings in Q408.
• EK’s stock dropped 29% on January 28th, when Q408 earnings were announced.
• EK has underperformed the S&P500 by almost 70% since January 28th.
 

source: www.economicmargin.com

When analysts and market pundits come on tv to talk about stock picks, they usually talk about the "P/E" ratio (Price to Earnings) being attractive.  However if you're investing in stocks and you only look at the "P/E" ratio, you might be walking into a "Value Trap".  Investors ignore half the valuation picture when investors only concentrate on P/E as investors also need to consider the growth potential of the company and what investments are needed to get the earnings.  The Applied Finance Group (AFG) has developed a process that incorporates these factors easily into the valuation framework.  Using AFG’s Valuation Metric, we have compiled a list of 20 companies with low P/E, 10 of which we consider attractive investments, and 10 of which we consider Value Traps.

By using AFG's Economic Margin framework instead of earnings alone, investors capture the true net cash flow the entire firm is generating. It is not uncommon for companies to grow P/E while having declining EM’s. This occurs when the cost for the investment required to yield the increasing P/E is more than the cash flow generated from the investment. By analyzing a company’s EMs through time, investors gain a more accurate account of levels and changes in a company’s current profitability and value.

If earnings are a true proxy for performance, there should be a correlation between a company growing earnings and its price to earnings ratio. As a surprise to many investors, there is actually little to no correlation between earnings growth and price to earnings ratios (see chart below).
 

P/E is determined by taking a stock’s price and dividing it by the last four quarter’s worth of earnings. P/E alone should not be used to value companies. P/E does not look at a company’s balance sheet thus we do not know what the costs of generating those earnings. While the P/E is determined by looking at a company’s past performance, EM bases a company’s value off its future projections. By using EM, an investor can know how their stocks are likely to perform, allowing them to clearly evaluate where to invest.

Successful companies measure results, make decisions and set strategy with the goal of creating value. A company’s performance measures must serve as a proxy for its market value creation. While important, S-T Earnings alone are a poor indicator of a company’s value, due to what they do not measure.
 

Economic Margin is a more complete performance measure for companies to use to guide performance and motivate employees. Executives consider Cash Flow, Investment, Competition & Risk when setting strategy. The above charts show that investors do the same.

AFG's Valuation Metric – Measures the percent to target (deviation between a stock’s current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model (modified discounted cash flow model).

Economic Margin - A corporate performance measurement that addresses the gaps in GAAP, eliminating distortions caused by accounting policies to measure what a company is truly earning above or below their cost of capital.

Investment Insights from your peers, Professional Investors - The Applied Finance Group would like to invite professional investors to join AFG’s Market Forecast Project so you can better understand what your peers currently think about the market and cultivate the “wisdom of Crowds” into actionable investment ideas and themes. 
Click here to learn more

Every year Fortune releases a list of the 40 best companies to invest in now to retire on. This long-term portfolio is designed to protect your hard-earned nest-egg as you approach retirement.

Last year Fortune’s portfolio of 40 best stocks to retire on returned -23.07% from 6-20-08 to 6-16-09, relative to the -30.8% returned by the S&P500 during the same time period. This year they are replacing 23 stocks to form the new portfolio.

Provided below are the 40 stocks recommended by Fortune as the best stocks to retire on in 2009 and our outlook of these companies from a valuation perspective based on The Applied Finance Group’s valuation model.

 Fortune's 40 Best Stocks to Retire On - 2009

Related Stock Article:
Is Apple a Buy Hold or Sell?, Click Here to View

All companies listed below met The Applied Finance Group's (AFG's) Buy screen criteria and are in the bottom half of their sector in Market Value/Invested Capital (MV/IC), which by definition qualifies the companies as part of the AFG Value Universe. When identifying buy ideas, AFG looks for companies with the most valuation upside compared to their sector peers, above sector median expected Economic Margin change, and a management quality score that reflects a management team following a wealth creating strategy.

 

9 Value Companies To Watch

A brief description of AFG's buy criteria variables:

AFG's Valuation Metric – Measures the percent to target (deviation between a stock’s current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model (modified discounted cash flow model).

Economic Margin - A corporate performance measurement that addresses the gaps in GAAP, eliminating distortions caused by accounting policies to measure what a company is truly earning above or below their cost of capital.

Management Quality– Assesses management’s ability to make wealth creating decisions.
AFG's Value Universe - Companies in the AFG universe, which have MV/IC at the bottom 50% of the universe and have EPS estimates.

Market Value/Invested Capital (MV/IC) - The firm's average total equity, debt and other obligations divided by net invested capital.

Back in February Valueexpectations.com released a blog highlighting Fidelity’s Low Priced Stock Fund that follows a strategy of only investing in stocks with a share price of under $35. In that blog we provided a list of 30 stocks that we thought were attractively priced according to The Applied Finance Group’s (AFG's) valuation model broken up into three price brackets: under $10, $10 to $20 and $20 to $35.

From Feb 5th 2009 to June 5th 2009 the 30 stocks recommended as a group outperformed the S&P 500 by an average of 36.5%, the 10 stocks under $10 outperformed by 57.1%, the $10 to $20 stocks outperformed by 40.1% and the $20 to $35 stocks outperformed by 12.5% respectedly. 

Joel Tillinghast, the fund’s manager began this fund with a strategy of only investing in stocks under $10. Since this stragtegy began Fidelity has moved the stock price limit to $35 where it currently sits. Tillinghast believes that share price alone is not of importance but the lower priced, smaller-cap universe of stocks experiences the most frequent mispricing’s and also has the least amount of analyst coverage.

As an update to the prior blog on this strategy Valueexpectations.com provided a list of 30 stocks that we believe are attractively priced and do not fit AFG's default sell criteria. Each group is ranked based on valuation attractiveness. AFG's analysis begins and ends with valuation, however along the way there are other key factors AFG considers when looking for buy opportunities: expected Economic Margin improvement, management quality, earnings quality.

 

Attractively Priced Companies Under $30

ValueExpectations.com recently posted, “Dividends are falling, so stocks have less value?” which gave some insight on our thoughts on the effect dividends have on stock values. We concluded that dividends alone are irrelevant in estimating a company’s value.

As a follow up to that article we have identified a dozen companies that pay a dividend and have the fundamentals to support the dividend. We looked at several fundamental factors to flush out companies that may be at risk of reducing their dividend in the near future. The end result, was a list of companies with:

-Positive Future Economic Margins
-Low Financial Debt
-High Management Quality
-High Valuation Score
-High Dividend Yield

 

Solid Companies That Pay A Dividend:

 

*AFG’s Value Expectation interface allows us to understand the imbedded Sales Growth, EBITDA Margins, and Asset Turnovers a company has to deliver in the future to justify its current trading price. In theory and in normal circumstances, if the imbedded future performance is very conservative relative to the company’s historical performance, the stock is regarded as undervalued. The above table displays the implied future sales growth of these mining companies assuming their EBITDA margins and Asset turnovers stay at the 5 year median levels.

Register with Value Expectations to Access Exclusive Market Reviews and Special Studies:

In life, the most attractive people are in shape and have good looks, just look at Hollywood. The same is true the majority of the time in investing. The most attractive stocks have healthy financial statements and look good from a valuation standpoint.

The Altman Z-score is a metric that gives insights into the likelihood of a firm going bankrupt in the next 2 years. The model was developed by Professor Edward I. Altman of the NYU’s Stern School of Business and first published in The Journal of FINANCE in September 1968. A common critique to this metric is that it was developed over 40 years ago and is no longer relevant.

In 2001, Professor Joseph D. Piotroski of The University of Chicago Graduate School of Business, published a paper called, Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski showed that value investors were rewarded by looking at a firm’s financial health and he showed that Z-score was a meaningful statistic.
More recently, on December 5, 2008, Dr. Altman was called to testify before a House of Representatives Committee on the condition of U.S. Automakers. In his testimony, he noted that Bloomberg, Inc. reported, “that approximately 1,000 users of their system per day access the Altman Z-Score model.”

The Altman Z-Score breaks down firms into 3 zones:
• >2.99 – Not Likely to Go Bankrupt
• 1.8 - 2.99 – Gray Area
• <1.8 – Likely to Go Bankrupt in the Next 2 Years

Using AFGView.com, we screened for firms that looked relatively attractive from a valuation perspective and had an Altman Z-Score above 2.99. Below is a list of those firms. Later we will look at firms that are expensive and have a Z-Score below 1.8.

Sales Expectations for Companies with an Attractive Valuation and Healthy Balance Sheet

For the past 26 years Steven Halpern, editor of thestockadvisors.com has gone to well known and respected advisors once a year to find out which stocks they like for the coming year. Take a look at the list of stocks advisors liked in 2008 and their performance. Also listed are the picks of 75 prominent advisors for 2009 along with sales growth expectations for the companies to justify their current price (VE Sales Growth) which can be compared to what they have delivered in revenue growth over the past 5 years(5 Year Median Sales Growth). These companies are worth a look because they are in favor of well-respected advisors, but the companies that also have low expectations for sales growth priced-in to their stock are especially worthy of a close review.

 

2008 Blogger Picks Conservative and 2008 Performance

 

2008 Blogger Picks Speculative and 2008 Performance

 

Blogger Picks for 2009 and Sales Expectations

* denotes # of years historical sales numbers available

VE Sales Growth calculated for these firms on 1-6-09